Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Why is it "pronunciation" and not "pronounciation"?

Parent

Why is it "pronunciation" and not "pronounciation"?

+10
−1

Generally speaking, when adding a suffix to a word in English, while the last letter(s) may undergo changes to accommodate the addition, the rest of the word is left unchanged. As examples in that sentence alone – general/generally, speak/speaking, add/adding/addition, change/changes/unchanged.

The only exception off the top of my head is the word pronounce. Nearly all of its variations — pronouncing, pronounced, pronounceable, pronouncement — all maintain the spelling of the word, save for the final e. However, one of its noun forms is pronunciation, where the central ⟨ou⟩ vowel is swapped out for a ⟨u⟩. Is there a historical reason why specifically the word pronunciation has its central vowel changed, among all of the forms of the word pronounce? Are there any other words in English which exhibit this phenomenon for the same reason?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (1 comment)
Post
+10
−0

A quick search gives a regular pattern in the form of trisyllabic laxing

Trisyllabic laxing, or trisyllabic shortening, is any of three processes in English in which tense vowels (long vowels or diphthongs) become lax (short monophthongs) if they are followed by two syllables the first of which is unstressed.

Pronounce -> pronunciation is one of the examples given in the article.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (4 comments)
General comments
nobodyImportant‭ wrote over 3 years ago · edited over 3 years ago

That's what I would say. But why the spelling changed? It could easily have been "pronounciation" with the new pronunciation caused by Trisyllabic Laxing. Why did the O get removed?

Moshi‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@DecapitatedSoul normally, you want the spelling of words to match their pronunciation.

Moshi‭ wrote over 3 years ago

The spelling never changed. People pronounced it as pronunciation, so people spelled it that way.

curiousdannii‭ wrote over 3 years ago

What evidence do you have that this is actually what happened? Wiktionary's etymologies for both words show that they came from different French words, both of which were already short vowels. So don't we really need an explanation for how pronounce came to have a long vowel?