Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Linguistics of categorization

Post

Linguistics of categorization

+2
−0

I think that in most languages, when people define sets of data in general and when people create taxonomy for website webpages in particular (webpage categorization), they would mostly name categories in plural but often in singular:

Plural webpage categories for example

  • Universes
  • Planets
  • Countries
  • People
  • Animals

Singular webpage categories for example

  • Philosophy
  • Psychology

People could use the naming "Philosophies" or "Psychologies" (the same way they would use "humanities") just alternatively.

What are the linguistic pressures behind categorization?
What linguistic-psychological motive would "point" a person to choose a plural or a singular name?


If I am not wrong, in Mandarin all nouns are singular (unless exceptionally stated otherwise), in Thai all nouns are plural (unless exceptionally stated otherwise) and I am not sure about Japanese.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

counting nouns vs mass nouns might be relevant? (1 comment)
counting nouns vs mass nouns might be relevant?
Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 3 years ago

The words in your first list are all counting nouns -- you have a planet or several planets, etc. The words in your second list are mass nouns; we can talk about "philosophy" or "psychology" or "science" or "education" as a collective thing. Now, mass nouns can also be counting nouns, if for example you are distinguishing two different philosophies, but it also makes sense to talk about philosophy collectively. Don't know how this affects tagging, but might be relevant.