Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on How to deal with questions on English grammar and usage

Post

How to deal with questions on English grammar and usage

+7
−0

Languages & Linguistics has been getting some questions about relatively basic issues in the English language. There's nothing wrong with these questions as such, but they don't really fit the main purpose. Would it be worthwhile to create a new community for "English Language"? We could talk about disallowing such questions, but given the generally low level of traffic, that may be too drastic.

Summary: What's the best approach to questions about English grammar and usage: Disallow them? Give them a new home? Do nothing?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Some background (2 comments)
Not just English (1 comment)
Some background
Moshi‭ wrote about 3 years ago

We had some discussion a long while back about the differences between questions about language (language learners stuff, word requests, the whole shebang - stuff that would be on topic on SE's language specific sites) and linguistics. It's a really interesting discussion, but didn't really go anywhere towards clarifying what the "main purpose" of this site is - are we a linguistics site first, general language site second, or the other way around? Those are the sorts of questions that will guide how we deal with separating questions, if at all.

Jirka Hanika‭ wrote over 2 years ago

It seems to me that even after nine more years we haven't grown (in the volume of traffic) to the point where it would be clear that any particular splitting or excluding would be likely to produce lively, compact, more focused communities.

There's no objective, easy to check boundary between "language" and "linguistics" either. For some people, their own language(s) are "language" and foreign languages are "linguistics". For some people, narrow questions are "language" and broad questions are "linguistics". For some people, single-language questions (no matter how advanced) are "language", and 3+ languages questions are "linguistics". And so on. Linguistics is simply the study of language.

It may happen that some subset of the traffic will grow to the point of becoming dominant and then it might be worth looking at what defines it and see whether it deserves a site of its own, with a narrower scope than what we are currently advertising.