Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

77%
+5 −0
Q&A ~ません versus ~ないです

After researching a bit more, I found this StackExchange answer. Their answer is very informative, and includes a partial translation of a Japanese research paper (which I'm sadly not at the level ...

posted 4y ago by Moshi‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Moshi‭ · 2020-10-21T05:51:38Z (about 4 years ago)
After researching a bit more, I found [this StackExchange answer](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/a/2577). Their answer is very informative, and includes a partial translation of a Japanese research paper (which I'm sadly not at the level of being able to read). It concludes

> ~ません and ~ないです are semantically equivalent, but ~ないです is softer and less insistent. If you need to give a firm denial with no wiggle room, go with ~ません. But since this level of bluntness can be inappropriate in some situations, ~ないです is there if you need it.

An important caveat was brought up by Tsuyoshi Ito in a comment on that answer.

> An important fact about this paper is that it only discusses 自然談話 (spoken language?) (see section 2). According to the results cited in the paper, ません is overwhelmingly more common than ないです in written text.

-----

On the other hand, ~ないです is apparently considered incorrect by some speakers. The [Wiktionary page on ない](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84#Inflection_2) says,

> Generally, ません (masen) and ませんでした (masen deshita) (past) are the recommended formal negative endings, instead of the somewhat less formal ないです (nai desu) and なかったです (nakatta desu), which are considered incorrect by conservative speakers. 

This was also pointed out in the comments of the linked SE answer, though they seem to view it as a non-issue.

> ~ないです may not be correct from a linguistic standpoint (as to why, I have no idea), but it's so firmly entrenched in modern Japanese usage that by every other standard it's a perfectly valid form.

Also, from my searches I found [this comment on r/LearnJapanese](https://www.reddit.com/r/LearnJapanese/comments/fdl1j5/when_to_use_verbnai_desu_vs_verbmasen/) (which is one data point on the internet, but it's something.)

> They both mean same:)
> 
> However, people tend to use ”nai desu“ more, especially in conversation.
> 
> This is because “masen” has a bit strong nuance because it ends with denial “n”, and “nai desu” is softer nuisance because it ends with polite”desu”.
>
>
> So you can use both, but especially in conversation “nai desu” is more fluent and natural:)

## All this to say,

 - ません is more formal and firmer than ないです.
 - ません is therefore used more in text and ないです is used more in the spoken language.
 - ないです is commonly used even though it is considered incorrect by some speakers.