Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Meta What tag hierarchy and ontology should Linguistics use?

I was surprised with joy when I saw that Codidact allows tag hierarchies: A tag can have one or more children, and when you search on a tag you can either search just that tag or also search its...

1 answer  ·  posted 4y ago by fedorqui‭  ·  edited 4y ago by fedorqui‭

Question discussion tags
#2: Post edited by user avatar fedorqui‭ · 2020-11-16T14:03:27Z (about 4 years ago)
remove usage of categories to avoid confusion with Codidact's categories
  • I was surprised with joy when I saw that [Codidact allows tag hierarchies](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/276452):
  • >A tag can have one or more children, and when you search on a tag you can either search just that tag or also search its children. This gives communities another way to organize content.
  • This is extremely useful to properly categorize items: it is common in other communities that people tag with the specific subcategory, but then forget to add the general scope tag.
  • So what is the proposed ontology for the Languages & Linguistics site? I foresee a category for each language and then, eventually, subcategories for the rest.
  • But should we have general tags like [grammar](https://languages.codidact.com/categories/36/tags/3310), [pronunciation](https://languages.codidact.com/categories/36/tags/3343) and so on? Should others like [number](https://languages.codidact.com/categories/36/tags/3800) be part of a bigger category, so we just have more general categories?
  • I was surprised with joy when I saw that [Codidact allows tag hierarchies](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/276452):
  • >A tag can have one or more children, and when you search on a tag you can either search just that tag or also search its children. This gives communities another way to organize content.
  • This is extremely useful to properly categorize items: it is common in other communities that people tag with the specific concept, but then forget to add the general scope tag.
  • So what is the proposed ontology for the Languages & Linguistics site? I foresee a general set of tags for each language and then, eventually, specific tags for the rest.
  • But should we have general tags like [grammar](https://languages.codidact.com/categories/36/tags/3310), [pronunciation](https://languages.codidact.com/categories/36/tags/3343) and so on? Should others like [number](https://languages.codidact.com/categories/36/tags/3800) be part of a bigger category, so we just have more general tags on the top level?
#1: Initial revision by user avatar fedorqui‭ · 2020-11-02T10:28:16Z (about 4 years ago)
What tag hierarchy and ontology should Linguistics use?
I was surprised with joy when I saw that [Codidact allows tag hierarchies](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/276452):

>A tag can have one or more children, and when you search on a tag you can either search just that tag or also search its children. This gives communities another way to organize content.

This is extremely useful to properly categorize items: it is common in other communities that people tag with the specific subcategory, but then forget to add the general scope tag.

So what is the proposed ontology for the Languages & Linguistics site? I foresee a category for each language and then, eventually, subcategories for the rest.

But should we have general tags like [grammar](https://languages.codidact.com/categories/36/tags/3310), [pronunciation](https://languages.codidact.com/categories/36/tags/3343) and so on? Should others like [number](https://languages.codidact.com/categories/36/tags/3800) be part of a bigger category, so we just have more general categories?