Post History
(Continued discussion of a specific idea from What tag hierarchy and ontology should Linguistics use?) As you've probably noticed, we have the ability to put style tags differently. For example, t...
#3: Post edited
- (Continued discussion of a specific idea from [What tag hierarchy and ontology should Linguistics use?](https://languages.codidact.com/questions/278930))
As you've probably noticed, we have the ability to put style tags differently. For example, the discussion, feature-request, support, and bug tags have a different color scheme from the other tags (and are also displayed before the others). There are two (ok three) types of tag styling:- - Required tags: a question must use at least one from a defined set. The four dark-blue meta tags are defined like this.
- Topic tags: not required (a question doesn't have to use any of them), but they get special styling when they're used. Currently this styling is a darker border around the (regular) tag. [Photo & Video](https://photography.codidact.com/) uses these.- - Moderator-only tags: like the status tags; not applicable here but included for completeness.
Should we make language tags topic tags so they stand out a little?
- (Continued discussion of a specific idea from [What tag hierarchy and ontology should Linguistics use?](https://languages.codidact.com/questions/278930))
- As you've probably noticed, we have the ability to put style tags differently. For example, the discussion, feature-request, support, and bug tags have a different color scheme from the other tags (and are also displayed before the others).
- For context, there are three types of tag styling:
- - Required tags: a question must use at least one from a defined set. The four dark-blue meta tags are defined like this.
- - Topic tags: not required (a question doesn't have to use any of them), but they get special styling when they're used.
- - Moderator-only tags: like the status tags; not applicable here but included for completeness.
- I suggest we set language tags as topic tags so they stand out more.
#2: Post edited
- (Continued discussion of a specific idea from [What tag hierarchy and ontology should Linguistics use?](https://languages.codidact.com/questions/278930))
As you've probably noticed, we have the ability to put style tags differently. For example, the discussion, feature-request, support, and bug tags have a different color scheme from the other tags (and are also displayed before the others).Should we apply this to language tags?
- (Continued discussion of a specific idea from [What tag hierarchy and ontology should Linguistics use?](https://languages.codidact.com/questions/278930))
- As you've probably noticed, we have the ability to put style tags differently. For example, the discussion, feature-request, support, and bug tags have a different color scheme from the other tags (and are also displayed before the others). There are two (ok three) types of tag styling:
- - Required tags: a question must use at least one from a defined set. The four dark-blue meta tags are defined like this.
- - Topic tags: not required (a question doesn't have to use any of them), but they get special styling when they're used. Currently this styling is a darker border around the (regular) tag. [Photo & Video](https://photography.codidact.com/) uses these.
- - Moderator-only tags: like the status tags; not applicable here but included for completeness.
- Should we make language tags topic tags so they stand out a little?
#1: Initial revision
Styling language tags
(Continued discussion of a specific idea from [What tag hierarchy and ontology should Linguistics use?](https://languages.codidact.com/questions/278930)) As you've probably noticed, we have the ability to put style tags differently. For example, the discussion, feature-request, support, and bug tags have a different color scheme from the other tags (and are also displayed before the others). Should we apply this to language tags?