Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Why is my Danglish pronunciation much better than Danish?

In the Pinyin romanization of Mandarin Chinese, the 't' denotes a voiceless aspirated coronal stop and the 'd' denotes a voiceless unaspirated coronal stop. But, since I'm a native English speaker,...

posted 3y ago by Jordan‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Jordan‭ · 2020-12-13T00:08:02Z (over 3 years ago)
In the Pinyin romanization of Mandarin Chinese, the 't' denotes a voiceless aspirated coronal stop and the 'd' denotes a **voiceless** unaspirated coronal stop. But, since I'm a native English speaker, I just use my standard voiceless aspirated coronal stop for 't' and my standard **voiced** unaspirated coronal stop for 'd'. In English we don't really have voiceless unaspirated stops at the starts of words, for whatever reason, so the Mandarin-style 'd' is really difficult for me. Lucky for me, Mandarin does not have any voiced coronal stops at all, so as long as I get the aspiration right I'll sound like an American but they'll understand my 'd' just fine.

Maybe Finnish also has no voiceless unaspirated stops at the starts of words; it has the same voice-aspiration pairings as English. I have no idea if that is true, but let's assume. Then you would probably mangle Mandarin in the same way that I mangle Mandarin: you would sound steriotypically Manglish! Like Danglish? From merging "Mandarin" and "English?" Well anyway just because you mangle Mandarin the same way that I mangle Mandarin, it does not mean that you speak English the same way that I speak English. Yeah you pronounce word-leading coronal stops the same, but there is no guarantee that you can also master English's many and nuanced fricatives! Your ability to do Manglish is not the same as your ability to do Mandarin or English, just like your ability to do Danglish is not the same as your ability to do Danish or English.

Big disclaimer: I have no idea how specifically you are mangling English, or which phonemes Finnish and Danish share that enable you to mangle English in the same way. This is all just a guess. If you do want to dig deeper, note that you should not look only at phonemes present naturally in each language... it's easy for me to change how I hold my mouth and my tongue to try to get some of Mandarin's retroflex consonants, which are not naturally in English, but I am probably screwing them up in a systematically predictable way because of how I am used to breathing, or because of how I am used to gliding into particular vowel sounds.