Post History
I don't understand this semantic shift, because a misdeed differs from a penalty or "something to which the right is lost through a misdeed". Can someone please fill in the gap? forfeit [13] ...
Question
etymology
#1: Initial revision
How did 'forfeit' shift to signify ‘penalty imposed for committing such a misdeed'?
I don't understand this semantic shift, because a misdeed differs from a penalty or ["something to which the right is lost through a misdeed"](https://www.etymonline.com/word/forfeit#etymonline_v_40774). Can someone please fill in the gap? >### forfeit [13] >A *forfeit* was originally a ‘transgression’ or ‘misdemeanour’. The word comes from Old French *forfet*, a derivative of the verb *forfaire* or *forsfaire* ‘commit a crime’. This was a compound formed from *fors-* ‘beyond (what is permitted or legal)’, which is descended from Latin *forīs* ‘outdoor, outside’ (source of English *forest* and related to *foreign*), and *faire* ‘do, act’, which came from Latin *facere* (whence English *fact, fashion, feature*, etc). The etymological meaning ‘misdeed’ was originally taken over from Old French into Middle English (‘Peter was in hand nummen [taken] for forfait he had done’, *Cursor mundi* 1300), but by the 15th century it was being edged out by ‘penalty imposed for committing such a misdeed’. *Word Origins* (2005 2e) by John Ayto, p 226 Left column.