Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

75%
+4 −0
Q&A Which phrase is correct? (Is using plural form for singular object make sense?) (Does using plural form for singular object make sense?)

Do Support Let's see exactly where the sentence comes from. There are two processes going on here, "do support" and "inversion". The full, standard non-question sentence is, of course, "Using the...

posted 3y ago by Moshi‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Moshi‭ · 2021-09-22T23:46:00Z (about 3 years ago)
## Do Support

Let's see exactly where the sentence comes from. There are two processes going on here, ["do support"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do-support) and ["inversion"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subject%E2%80%93auxiliary_inversion).

The full, standard non-question sentence is, of course, "Using the plural form for a singular object makes sense." In "title-ese", of course, we tend to drop such things as the articles 'the' and 'a', and I will do so here as well to match the title in question.

In older English, we could directly invert it to form a question, i.e. "Makes using plural form for singular object sense?" However, in modern English, non-modal verbs are forbidden to undergo inversion. How can we form a question then? Using "do support": we use and invert the helping verb "do" (inflected as necessary).

Original Sentence | "Using plural form for singular object makes sense."
-----|-----
Do support | "Using plural form for singular *does make* sense."
Plain inversion (archaic) | "Makes using plural form for singular object sense?"
Do support + Inversion | "Does using plural form for singular subject make sense?"

## Comparison with 'is'

Usage of 'is' is the continuous form. Notably, in your case, the present continuous (though you didn't inflect "make").

Original Sentence | "Using plural form for singular object makes sense."
-----|-----
Present continuous | "Using plural form for singular is making sense."
Present continuous + Inversion | "Is using plural form for singular subject making sense?"

While not grammatically incorrect, this would be strange to say because it uses the present continuous, that is, you are asking if it makes sense *at the moment*, not in general. With the 'do' construction, we are asking generally, which fits better in this context - a sentence making sense does not rely on the time.

Let's illustrate this with another sentence where the two constructions both make sense, but mean different things:

Original Sentence | "He smiles."
-----|-----
Present continuous | "He is smiling." (right now)
Present continuous + Inversion | "Is he smiling?" (right now)
Do support | "He does smile." (There are times when he smiles)
Do support + Inversion | "Does he smile?" (Are there times when he smiles?)