Post History
It would take a literature search to prove it, but I think that the claimed etymology is not precisely correct for English. It is often the case for English that a word is adopted and then a mutati...
Answer
#1: Initial revision
It would take a literature search to prove it, but I think that the claimed etymology is not precisely correct for English. It is often the case for English that a word is adopted and then a mutation of it happens independently of mutations in the original language. As an alternative source for arrogant, please consider arrogate: > https://www.merriam-webster.com > arrogate: [verb] to claim or seize without justification. to make undue claims to having : assume. I think Ayto is skipping arrogate as the source of the modern English arrogant because it might look like an unnecessary waypoint. However, the semantic similarity is important: arrogant is an adjectival form of the verb arrogate. An -ant ending signifies adjectives concerned with states of being: immigrant, contaminant, dominant. The ad- prefix means "toward", specifically, rather than the indicator of an infinitive one might otherwise assume in English.