Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Policy for Q&A pertaining to (potentially) objectionable material

+6
−0

Of course users of Codidact are expected not to direct offensive language at each other in general. But there are many coherent, potentially valuable questions that could be asked about language that is in some way potentially offensive: whether profane, vulgar, impolite (perhaps contextually), politically charged, etc.

How should such questions be approached here? In particular, are there any specific expectations to hide or censor certain kinds of content?

In particular, what if the OP is mistaken about the assessment of what is likely to offend (or otherwise cause a problem, e.g. NSFW language)?

History

1 comment thread

This may vary across sections of a post (1 comment)

1 answer

+4
−0

There should be a distinction between using offensive language, and asking about offensive language. The former is clearly not cool, but the latter can be OK, even useful.

History

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »