Review Suggested Edit

You can't approve or reject suggested edits because you haven't yet earned the Edit Posts ability.

Policy for Q&A pertaining to (potentially) objectionable material

Of course users of Codidact are expected not to direct offensive language at each other in general. But there are many coherent, potentially valuable questions that could be asked *about* language that is in some way potentially offensive: whether profane, vulgar, impolite (perhaps contextually), politically charged, etc.
How should such questions be approached here? In particular, are there any specific expectations to hide or censor certain kinds of content?
~~In particular, what if the OP is mistaken about the assessment of what is likely to offend (or otherwise cause a problem, e.g. NSFW language)?~~

Of course users of Codidact are expected not to direct offensive language at each other in general. But there are many coherent, potentially valuable questions that could be asked *about* language that is in some way potentially offensive: whether profane, vulgar, impolite (perhaps contextually), politically charged, etc.
How should such questions be approached here? In particular, are there any specific expectations to hide or censor certain kinds of content?
In particular, what if the OP is mistaken about the assessment of what is likely to offend (or otherwise cause a problem, e.g. [NSFW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_safe_for_work "Not Safe For Work") language)?

discussion policy censorship