Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Meta Feature request: Ruby text

As a Japanese learner, I think it would be really helpful if posts could contain ruby text. While I would use it mostly for Japanese, it's not something specific to it. I can see it being used for ...

0 answers  ·  posted 4y ago by Moshi‭

Question feature-request
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Moshi‭ · 2020-10-21T01:10:55Z (about 4 years ago)
Feature request: Ruby text
As a Japanese learner, I think it would be really helpful if posts could contain [ruby text](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_character). While I would use it mostly for Japanese, it's not something specific to it. I can see it being used for other languages as well, where currently I see people adding romanizations after the text, eg. [here](https://languages.codidact.com/questions/277126). 

While possibly a bit of a stretch for our current software, we could also try to add in a shortcut for ruby text. [Japanese.SE has a script](https://japanese.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/806/how-should-i-format-my-questions-on-japanese-language-se/807#807) that converts `[text]{gloss}` into something that isn't html ruby but functions pretty much the same[^1]; we could make something similar.

[^1]: It also has various other features that I feel would improve this site a lot, such as IPA support, but that's a different discussion