Post History

How did rǣda work syntactically, after shifting from 'advise' to mean 'interpret and understand the meaning of written symbols'? 

[Old English _rǣda_ semantically shifted from ‘advise, consult, guess’ to mean ‘interpret, interpret letters, read’](https://languages.codidact.com/posts/28708). 

But isn't this semantic shift unsyntactical and  infelicitous? 

>Advisor's writing _rǣda_ (in the sense of 'advise') Advisee.

is felicitous. 

>Advisor's writing _rǣda_ (in the sense of '**read**') Advisee.

is infelicitous. The correct syntax is

>Advisee _rǣda_ (_qua_ '**read**') Advisor's writing.

To wit, if an advisor counsels an advisee in writing, then the advisor doesn't need to read. It is the advisee who shall read the advisor's writing!