Notifications
Mark all as read
Q&A

Why is the ـً in "شُكْرًا" and others pronounced?

+5
−1

Why is the -an in "شُكْرًا" (shukran) pronounced?

I've heard it pronounced this way in Modern Standard Arabic and in colloquial. In both, I'd usually expect the -an to not be pronounced, especially not before a pause as "شكرًا" is often used where instead I'd expect it to be pronounced shukra. I think there are others like "أَهْلًا وَسَهْلًا‎", "أَيْضًا", "طَبْعًا" for which the -an is also pronounced. Noteworthy is مَرْحَبًا which I have only ever heard as marḥaba without the -an.

Is there a rule for this exception, for when the -an is pronounced out of the norm?

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comments

I think ancient Arabs used to pronounce each diacritic (al-Harakaat) on Arabic letters. In our modern times and maybe also due to the pausing rules in tajweed (of the qur'an) people don't pronounce them at the end of a sentence (when making a pause). I've once heard a scholar correcting his student who didn't pronounce them fully while reading a hadith, saying this shows either ignorance of the correct pronunciation or laziness. Note that 'Iraab is grammar at also means making something Arabic. Medi1saif‭ 25 days ago

@Medi1saif Thanks, removed the mention of i3raab. user53100‭ 22 days ago

1 answer

+1
−0

I asked a native speaker and the following are his responses representing his theory, edited slightly (posting here with permission). N.B. He emphasises many times that this is speculation. Also, Arabizi is used for the Latin transliteration, so "3" represents ع.

I can't really give you an educated answer that's backed by any resources, but I can give you my theory.

It has to do with syllables and the word ending with an alif mamduda ا. Take the word طبعًا as an example; "tab-3an", it's two 'complete' syllables where each one has two non-vowels and a vowel separating them. Both the syllables are 'mirrored' in a sense and removing any part of the syllable will make the word feel incomplete (kind of skewed) such as "tab-3a". Same can be said for أهلًا, "aah-lan". Saying "aah-la" makes [it] seem like there's something missing in the second syllable. That's why you really only see أهلًا pronounced without the tanween if it's followed by something, like the common saying "ahla w sahla" أهلا وسهلا. If you divide the whole sentence into syllables, you'll see that the و is filling in that empty spot "ah-law sah-la". You might ask why سهلا didn't get a tanween, and my answer would be because the whole sentence seems complete. It goes xx-xxx xxx-xx, as in it's completely mirrored.

I also want to mention that the syllable formula of xxx-xx is very odd for Arabic. Even in MSA [Modern Standard Arabic]. I can't really think of a word that follows this sense of syllables.

Now jumping into مرحبًا, you'll notice that it's a special case in which it doesn't have two syllables like the others, but rather has three. "mar-ha-ba". This is actually a very common syllable formula in Arabic, and thus sounds natural with the tanween or not. Similar words share this formula such as مَرْكَبَة "mar-ka-ba", مِدْفَعَة "mid-fa-3a". That's likely why this was an exception!

[T]ake [this explanation] with a huge grain of salt, but syllables in Arabic formulation matter A LOT. If you ever get into Arabic poetry, you'll notice that a lot of them balance out the syllables in either side and usually follow a specific pattern as to not have one that's out of place or the sense that one is missing

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comments

Sign up to answer this question »

This community is part of the Codidact network. We have other communities too — take a look!

You can also join us in chat!

Want to advertise this community? Use our templates!