Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs

Dashboard
Notifications
Mark all as read
Q&A

What sound did the letter ℵ encode in ancient Hebrew, and why did it morph into the greek vowel Α?

+6
−0

Here are two claims I've often heard or read:

  1. The Hebrew language originally did not write down vowels.

  2. The Greek (and subsequently the Latin) alphabet developed from the Hebrew alphabet. In particular, the letter ℵ (aleph) developed into the Greek Α (alpha) and finally the Latin A.

Now I noticed some apparent contradiction in this: The Greek Α as well as the Latin A both encode a vowel. So if it evolved from the Hebrew ℵ, it seems that this should also encode the same vowel. But that cannot be if there were no vowels in ancient Hebrew.

Therefore I guess that not only the letter, but also the sound associated with that letter changed. Therefore my question:

What sound did the letter ℵ encode in ancient Hebrew, and why did it morph into the greek vowel Α?

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (3 comments)

2 answers

+6
−0

ℵ (aleph) is a consonant in Hebrew, not a vowel. Like other consonants, it can carry a vowel.[1] You'll see the vowel markers (nikud) in "pointed" Hebrew, but someone who is fluent in Hebrew doesn't need them for comprehension so they're left out of most texts other than children's/learners' texts and (for precision) prayer books and print/study copies of biblical texts.[2]

Aleph is a consonant, but it's silent. I've seen (but can't currently source) a passage in the talmud (completed around 500CE) that talks about the revelation at Sinai beginning with a silent letter (aleph is the first letter of the first word), so it was silent at least back that far. I can't prove one way or the other whether it was silent in the ancient near east.

I can't answer the part of the question about the transition into Greek, but I figured I could at least offer half an answer.


  1. There are five gutteral consonants and the rules are different for them. Aleph isn't one of them. ↩︎

  2. The torah scroll that you'll see used in synagogues does not have the vowel markings. I'm referring to print copies that are often accompanied by translations and commentary. Those usually have vowels marked in the Hebrew. ↩︎

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (4 comments)
+5
−0

It is not accurate to say that the Greek alphabet developed from the Hebrew alphabet as we know it. Instead, the two have a common predecessor in the Phoenician alphabet. In this sense you could say that the common predecessor of the Greek letter alpha (α) and Hebrew 'aleph (א) was a Phoenician alphabet letter ʾālep (𐤀). When I transliterate the name of the letter ʾālep, please note the initial apostrophe, which transliterates an ʾālep letter. It's unsurprising that the name of a letter begins with that letter.

All letters in the Phoenician alphabet represent consonants. The Phoenician alphabet was used to write a number of languages, including Phoenician and Hebrew.

In Phoenician, ʾālep is never silent. It represents a glottal stop, a sound denoted as /ʔ/.

Glottis sits in your neck, it is the opening between your vocal cords; it's what "gives you your voice". The best known use of the glottis is forcing your vocal cords to vibrate (i.e., to interrupt the flow of air about a hundred times per second). Based on what is happening above your neck, this produces various vowels or it gives voicing to any voiced consonants. However, it is also possible - and rather common - to to close the glottis briefly (stopping the flow of the air through the neck momentarily), and then release it either on the onset of a vowel (which produces a glottal stop, a consonant articulated purely at the glottis), or perhaps together with articulating a consonant somewhere else (which produces a particular "glottalized consonant".)

A glottal stop isn't the only way to start articulating a vowel. A glottal stop gives you an abruptly starting vowel, a vowel which starts with a tiny "explosion". You could also keep your vocal cords somewhat relaxed (but not too relaxed or too distanced from each other which would disable vibration altogether) and then the vowel will begin sounding gradually.[1]

In Phoenician, ʾālep is always pronounced as a glottal stop.

In (Biblical or older) Hebrew, 'aleph can be pronounced as a glottal stop or it can be completely silent.

In (Ancient) Greek or (Modern) English, a word-initial vowel can start with or without a glottal stop[2]. That's somewhat similar to Hebrew, except that there's no tradition to have a letter for a glottal stop in Indo-European scripts, whereas Semitic scripts do have a letter which tends to have that function.

The previous paragraph is very possibly just a rather long lasting and geographically extensive artifact of the way how ancient Greeks chose to (re)interpret the Phoenician letter 𐤀.

How could that happen? Well, if you ask someone to pronounce a bare consonant for you, they can't. "Con-sonant" means the consonant needs to sit on a vowel somehow. In many languages, the "default" vowel that a speaker would use in this situation is traditionally /a/. So, when asked to pronounce /'/, the speaker says /'a/. And the listener may well choose to hear just /a/. It's also possible to imagine the opposite situation when you are trying to transcribe Greek names inside Phoenician texts and run into the problem that Phoenician words never begin with vowels while some Greek words do; it is tempting to hear and write an ʾālep in that situation.

Add to it a different structure of Semitic and Indo-European languages. Semitic languages can't ignore the equivalent of the glottal stop even in the languages where actually pronouncing it is optional, or where it is completely silent, because it has its place in (say) tri-consonantal lexical roots. Greek is grammatically more like English - the root of the word tends to stick together and so it doesn't matter very much how you choose to count its sounds.


  1. Or there's also a way to give a breathy start to a vowel (a bit longer lasting noise), which is yet another kind of glottal contribution to vowel articulation. It's more or less up to your cultural perceptions (how your language works, and how it is traditionally described), whether you will interpret those "extra" functions of your glottal cords as distinct consonants, or as distinct ways of pronouncing a vowel. And English speakers may appreciate that English has at least one unambiguous consonant articulated in the glottis: /h/ is a voiceless glottal fricative; this same sound may perhaps be perceived as voiced by some because the particular position of the vocal cords lets the consonant be enveloped by adjacent "voiced" vibration of the cords. It stands to reason that the vocal cords can't vibrate and "hiss" completely simultaneously, which is why /h/ is technically voiceless. ↩︎

  2. I'm stretching the consensus when comparing Ancient Greek to Modern English here. Some people would even point out that Greek eventually added an extra letter (called ψιλὸν πνεῦμα) for the absence of anything like an /h/ or a glottal stop before the word-initial vowel, whereas others might rather call the possible interpretation of ψιλὸν πνεῦμα as marking a presence of a glottal stop to be "highly improbable". At any rate, the ψιλὸν πνεῦμα grapheme wasn't an original feature of the Greek alphabet, and if there were any glottal stops at that time, arguments can be made that they must have been non-phonological like in Modern English. ↩︎

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (7 comments)

Sign up to answer this question »