Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Activity for curiousdanniiā€­

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Comment Post #285572 question is too broad
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #285121 The "How did word X shift to mean Y" questions all come from one user who has been banned from all of Stack Exchange. That doesn't mean they should be banned here, but I would caution against using their posts as evidence of any broader trends.
(more)
over 2 years ago
Comment Post #280275 Why are all the options borderline ungrammatical, and none include "me"??
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279738 English doesn't have a future tense, so what else could it possible do???
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279453 Well if it's not useful then it's visual noise.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279477 Does Codidact have tag filters, favourite tags, anything like that yet?
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279346 I'd call the two categories "Languages Q&A" and "Linguistics Q&A".
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279453 Why do you think language tags should stand out more? Won't the languages be pretty obvious from the question titles?
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279346 @Jirka Yes I am aware of that, but that only works when people have tagged things correctly, and it would only help me if there was one tag that was applied to all linguistics questions, and I don't think there should be.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #277394 What evidence do you have that this is actually what happened? Wiktionary's etymologies for [both](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pronounce) [words](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pronunciation) show that they came from different French words, both of which were already short vowels. So don't we real...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #277298 What evidence do you have that this is actually what happened? Wiktionary's etymologies for [both](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pronounce) [words](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pronunciation) show that they came from different French words, both of which were already short vowels. So don't we real...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279346 Tags won't help me avoid seeing etymology, usage, or translation questions. And I doubt I'll be able to cultivate an interest for them when so many of them are so poorly presented/researched/etc. The real answer to a lot of these questions (at least the ones from Stack Exchange) is "It's an arbitrary...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279346 Of course it's tricky because questions may use single languages and single words as examples. The answers will be different though. If it's a linguistics question then the answer will contextualise the single word and show how it fits into a larger part of knowledge.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279346 @Jirka I'd modify your definition to say that it's about the study of language *systems*. So most etymology questions, when they're focused on arbitrary single words, are arguably not really in the linguistics box and are the domain of the philologist instead of the linguist, and are only linguistics...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279346 @Jirka I don't think general-linguistics would be a useful tag, especially if the site has a question tag limit. I'd consider my question to mostly be on the linguistics side because I wanted to know from the perspective of lingustic typology whether Japanese has pronouns, not from the perspective of...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279310 @Moshi It's all about terminology, but if neopronoun refers to a coined pronoun (as compared to one that arose in the mists of time) then there's no reason it couldn't be grammaticalised. But maybe it would be clearer if I just referred to pronouns in this question.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279321 To my knowledge *hen* is not used only for non-binary/third gender people, so it's not what I'm asking about.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279109 [Didn't you get an informative enough answer last time?](https://english.stackexchange.com/q/500718/59258)
(more)
over 3 years ago