Activity for user53100
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #279437 |
How would you classify your normal English accent? Maybe Danish pronunciation is harder just because of the harder phonology? (I don't remember glottal stops in Danglish, nor guttural R's, nor "soft d's") (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278938 |
@Medi1saif Thanks, removed the mention of i3raab. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277129 |
Very related, I recently found this https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/a/4644 regarding the existence of biliteral Semitic (or even Afrasian) roots (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277129 |
@JirkaHanika My intent was to ask whether these relations between different roots are just coincidences, or whether there are many more such patterns within Classical Arabic. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277852 |
Thank you for the native insight (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277510 |
According to the [next section](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_grammar#Passive_voice) of that Wikipedia page, yes, it is the passive voice. @gerrit (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277364 |
Welcome to Codidact! It looks like you left some parts of the Arabic quotes un-translated (like the fatḥa on the lām). Also, would حرف جر mean preposition? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277281 |
@MonicaCellio I imagined that all such resources for the same language would be a part of the same post, but perhaps what you suggest is better. Let's see how it goes (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277304 |
Perhaps it would be worth explicitly mentioning "resources" in the description? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277281 |
@Sigma [Monica Cellio's answer there](https://languages.codidact.com/questions/277073#answer-277260) suggests "Create one article per language for useful resources for that language," which I agree with. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277260 |
I guess we can go ahead with creating the category? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277260 |
Referring to your last paragraph, another alternative could be simply editing in a new section with the type of request, with its emptiness signalling the need for resources. Or, as I commented to the other answer, it could be managed with comments to the posts where outdated comments would be cleane... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277086 |
@MonicaCellio Such a "cultivation" matches closely to what I'm thinking too. Each language can have its own post/article containing the resources. Requests for new resource types can be in the form of comments to said post. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277129 |
@msh210 Interesting, which of his works discusses this about Hebrew? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277115 |
I'm intending for this to be a "canonical" question, so feel free to improve on the post. For reference, [here is an answer](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/a/7049) on Stack Exchange that answers part of this question. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277086 |
I too agree with the idea of having a separate category for that. However, still having a Q&A format to questions in that category could be useful, as users would be able to vote on resources. What do you think? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |