Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Activity for Jirka Hanika‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Answer A: How can a prepositional phrase shift to become a verb?
Like any language change, it can be a bit confusing to current speakers while it is happening, but once the resulting verb is established, nobody will blink anymore. Latin was especially fond of verbification of prepositional phrases. Prepositions simply became prefixes. To overcome your unset...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Comment Post #279682 It seems (to me as a legal layman) that the quoted passages from "The paths to privity" explored the topic very well. I can only add that the _concept_ of privity of contract exists in other languages and legal cultures of continental Europe as well. The concept is however so basic that you could c...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Comment Post #279490 @PLTR PSTH - I have left the question as is, but I have made several things in the answer more definite and more explicit in case any of that helps.
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279490 Post edited:
Responding to comments
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279490 Post edited:
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279490 Post edited:
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279490 Post edited:
Added details requested per comment.
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279697 Post edited:
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279697 Post edited:
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279697 Initial revision almost 4 years ago
Answer A: Why past tense in imaginative play in Finnish?
The younger the child, the less established the grammar. You can respond with "Nyt se menee nukkumaan" and put the toy into its sleeping house, thus just implementing the suggestion using your own "adult" grammar. (I don't see the verb form used by the child as incorrect either. In their powerfu...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Comment Post #279490 @PLTR PSTH - Just to be sure about your question: how it shifted to mean "riposte" as in fencing, or how it shifted to mean "riposte" as in a verbal exchange?
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Comment Post #279490 @PLTR PSTH - I can research the other word and then edit the trailer of the answer, but it was the question which referred to the "2020 meaning" of "riposting" as if that word, unlike "repartir", was something assumed already clear. Was the question referring to a specific meaning, or perhaps to bot...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279651 Post edited:
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279651 Initial revision almost 4 years ago
Answer A: How did 'equity' semantically shift to mean 'Assets — Liabilities'?
The term (semantic) "shift" implies not just the emergence of a new meaning, but also abandonment of the old one. The old meanings you refer to are still present in current English, so it is perhaps premature to speak of a semantic shift; this answer attempts to explain the emergence of the particul...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Comment Post #279477 @Lundin - If we go with the category alternative, I imagine we'll need to introduce a transient tag first anyway, just to mark which existing posts are to be migrated to the new category. And if we don't: retagging new posts is easier than recategorizing them, right? (I'm just failing to see how a ...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Comment Post #279462 Not just in Japanese [not affirming myself], also in central Sardinian and maybe elsewhere in Romance. If anyone has any examples of Latin "f" which is not morpheme-initial, that might allow additional research into whether the particular developments appear the same or only partly the same, and thu...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279490 Initial revision almost 4 years ago
Answer A: How did « re » + « partir » compound to 🡲 "repartee", which means "rejoinder"?
partir is intransitive in modern French ("depart") but primarily transitive in Old French ("distribute", i.e., "make depart"). The transitive meaning is still preserved, as an archaism, in the set phrase "avoir maille à partir avec...". Analyze the prefix separately from the root: re- - again...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Comment Post #279477 @curiousdannii - Favorite tags would be a really cool addition. Hierarchical tags already work: https://meta.codidact.com/questions/276452
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279478 Initial revision almost 4 years ago
Answer A: Split off Linguistics into a site category?
This is one of four (or more) alternative answers. (I am posting the alternatives separately and simultaneously to allow separate voting and commenting. They represent elaborations of potential courses of action touched upon by comments on the question post. Comments on the answer post can now...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279477 Initial revision almost 4 years ago
Answer A: Split off Linguistics into a site category?
This is one of four (or more) alternative answers. (I am posting the alternatives separately and simultaneously to allow separate voting and commenting. They represent elaborations of potential courses of action touched upon by comments on the question post. Comments on the answer post can n...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279476 Initial revision almost 4 years ago
Answer A: Split off Linguistics into a site category?
This is one of four (or more) alternative answers. (I am posting the alternatives separately and simultaneously to allow separate voting and commenting. They represent elaborations of potential courses of action touched upon by comments on the question post. Comments on the answer post can now...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279475 Initial revision almost 4 years ago
Answer A: Split off Linguistics into a site category?
This is one of four (or more) alternative answers. (I am posting the alternatives separately and simultaneously to allow separate voting and commenting. They represent elaborations of potential courses of action touched upon by comments on the question post. Comments on the answer post can now...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Comment Post #279462 Arabic has initial "f" and Spanish actually retains it easily, although it was lost in some early loanwords as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_language_influence_on_the_Spanish_language#F,_G
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Edit Post #279459 Initial revision almost 4 years ago
Answer A: Styling language tags
Languages already stand out more because they just got capitalized. However, I like the idea to make them stand out even more. There are two good ways to do it: topic tags and required tags. Topic tags We currently don't have tags for (genetical) language families. For example this question ...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Comment Post #279346 @curiousdannii - We can retag incorrect tagging, which is an advantage of tags over categories. Would the hypothetical two categories really be named "Q&A" and "Linguistics"? Such naming would probably cause a new user to post their first question into a random category, and a moderator to be unable...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Comment Post #279346 @curiousdannii - Are you aware that you can already click on "Tags", tag name, and suddenly you only see questions tagged with that particular tag, and no other questions?
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Comment Post #279346 I'm entertaining a plan of (someone, could be myself) writing up the best possible tag-based and category-based solution as two respective answers and see how they get voted. Anyone could add a third or fourth, for example negative answer (if they have specific concerns), too.
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Comment Post #279346 @Moshi - Great, that equalizes things. I was going to write an answer today suggesting to go with a consistently applied tag "general-linguistics". But it was mainly because I couldn't see how to share the tags. My remaining concern with the original proposal is naming. Would the two categories r...
(more)
almost 4 years ago
Comment Post #279346 I'm still learning the ropes. But it seems that there's currently a functional parity between the ability to search for posts by a tag versus by category. And contributors plus moderators are able to gradually fix any inaccurate tagging, but category is essentially permanent, i.e., in the hands of ...
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #279290 @Lundin - the license that authors issue to SE is a non-exclusive one. (Like here.)
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #279346 Supposing we can agree where to draw the line between linguistics and philology (so that it works for everybody), we'd still have to evaluate a tag based approach versus a category based approach. I think that a new category makes sense if "linguistics" and "philology" would have entirely separate t...
(more)
about 4 years ago
Edit Post #279315 Post edited about 4 years ago
Comment Post #279206 ...~~declinations~~ declensions :-)
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #279282 @fedorqui - It was a polite declination. (I don't know whether I should delete the answer post through which the nomination was made, so simplify this question post, or to keep it for increased transparency of the process and to avoid potential duplicate nominations.)
(more)
about 4 years ago
Suggested Edit Post #279315 Suggested edit:
My own answer would have been very similar to yours, except that I feel I know why some say that Japanese does not have pronouns.
(more)
helpful about 4 years ago
Comment Post #279346 @curiousdannii - For me personally, linguistics is defined as the study of language. So there's not much of a difference between "a question about a language" and "a question involving linguistics". So more examples would perhaps help me see where the line could be drawn. My first idea of "particu...
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #279346 Would a consistently used "general-linguistics" tag (for example, for questions not targeting a single specific language) work for you equivalently? Could you please edit the question to provide examples of where you'd like the line to be drawn? For example, would [this question](https://languages.c...
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #279179 @Moshi - OK, that makes sense. Thank you.
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #277071 The stop-gap text (the short description) seems to me remarkably good. The three clauses overlap each other a lot. But together they disambiguate each other. I'm not sure whether we need to polish it any further until we receive complaints or misunderstandings. Of course, any suggestions for a re...
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #279179 Sorry for a very basic question. What would go wrong if we simply used Noto Sans as is? I'm just trying to understand where the challenges are.
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #279238 Thank you for the nomination. Accepted. I intend to moderate in moderation.
(more)
about 4 years ago
Edit Post #279282 Post edited:
about 4 years ago